MEDIATION IN MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE CASES: BENEFITS AND PITFALLS
When it comes to mediating your medical negligence matter, there are a number of benefits to the informal settlement process, but there are also some negatives to resolve your claim at Mediation.
In our previous articles, we have discussed the elements of medical negligence compensation; establishing negligence, causation, and the standard of competent professional practice as judged by the defendant’s peers.
Due to the difficulty satisfying the elements of medical negligence / medical malpractice many medical negligence matters settle outside of Court in alternative dispute resolution processes such as mediation and informal settlement conferences. This is it is a better alternative than going to court, especially if there is a chance you may not be successful. Many find, alternative dispute resolution preferable to going to Court as they allow parties to settle the case without the extra burden of legal costs.
WHAT IS MEDIATION?
Mediation is where an agreed independent mediator is assigned by the parties in order to help the parties resolve the claim. The mediator’s role is not to comment on evidence or to hand down a judgment. Instead, the mediator plays an impartial role and helps parties break down the issues in dispute and to assist the parties to reach an agreement.
You can read more about the mediation process in our previous blog post.
WHAT ARE THE BENEFITS?
Mediation is very beneficial to plaintiff’s in medical negligence matters as there is no requirement in mediation for plaintiffs to give evidence or face the defendant, which is usually a traumatic and emotional experience in a court setting.
Mediation is also very cost effective, as no expert or lay witnesses are required, and the plaintiff avoids paying legal fees for a what could be a lengthy hearing.
WHAT ARE THE PITFALLS?
If the medical negligence case settles at mediation, the settlement agreement will usually contain a clause in which the defendant states that the settlement is not an admission of liability for the injury sustained by the plaintiff.
Further, matters settled at mediation are not recorded and not registered with the Australian Medical Authority. This means that there is no way for future patients to see if their doctor has been sued for medical negligence.
SHOULD I GO TO MEDIATION?
YES! Despite the pitfalls, mediation is a very effective and efficient way of settling medical negligence / medical malpractice matters and are a necessary dispute resolution step when making a medical negligent claim.
GARLING & CO 2019
About Matthew Garling
Matthew Garling, Founder of Garling & Co is a NSW Law Society Accredited Specialist in Personal Injury Law. He specialises in compensation law and has acted on behalf of thousands of injured people in work accidents, motor vehicle accidents and negligence cases over the last 20 years.
About Renee Lawes
Renee Lawes is a Solicitor of the Supreme Court of NSW and has been working alongside Matthew Garling at Garling & Co Lawyers for over five years. Renee’s areas of interest are Medical Negligence / Medical Malpractice and TPD claims.
Over the last five years Renee has helped secure many injured clients the compensation they deserve for their injuries.
Further Blog Articles You May Be Interested In –