Our client was compensation $582,000 plus his legal costs after being assaulted, wrongly arrested and falsely imprisoned.
Our client has proceeded to walk back to his hotel. At the same time the cab driver has called out to police on the other side of the road and told them that he has been assaulted.
The Police ran after our client who was still walking towards his hotel.
When the police officer caught up Mr Hamilton, without any warning the officer grabbed him from behind, swung him into a wall, then tackled him to the floor, stood him up, and then leg swept him to the floor again where he proceeded to kneel on him and handcuff him. At this stage another police officer arrived to help detain our client.
During this process our client did not resist and complied with directions of the police officers.
Mr Hamilton sustained significant injuries from the use of force by the police officer, including a significant psychological injury.
The police officer claimed that he did not conduct the arrest in such a way, and that our client had tried to assault him by throwing a punch. Fortunately, we were able to obtain CCTV footage confirming our client’s story, at no stage had our client resisted arrest or tried to assault the police officer.
In fact, the CCTV footage made it clear that the police without warning, chased our client and then assaulted him all on the pretext of making an arrest. The police should simply have approached our client from in front, announced themselves as police and asked our client to stop. Instead they chose to swing our client into a nearby wall, head first causing significant injury.
The matter was heard in the Supreme Court before Justice Campbell who found that Mr Hamilton was assaulted by the police, wrongly arrested, falsely imprisoned, was maliciously prosecuted, and had sustained significant injury due to the force used by the police officers.
Justice Campbell found in favour of Mr Hamilton and ordered the State of NSW to pay our client compensation in the amount of $582,000 plus his legal costs.
You might also be interested in…BACK TO BLOG
Garling & Co settles botched double mastectomy case
In 2018, Garling and Co Lawyers resolved a complex medical negligence / medical malpractice case inv...READ POST